Compare
Decot vs your current stack
DocuSign, Ironclad, a homegrown CLM — keep what works. Here’s the gap each kind of tool leaves a regulated team, and the two or three things Decot adds that your current tools can’t prove.
Why teams switch
Already have a CLM or e-signing tool?
Keep what works. Two kinds of tools exist today — and a regulated team feels the gap in each at the worst possible moment: when it has to prove something.
Centralized CLM & e-signing
- One breach exposes every contract at once.
- Privileged admins can alter history with little trace.
- Verification stops at your company boundary — a counterparty still has to take your word.
Early blockchain tools
- Public ledgers can leak sensitive business data.
- Wallets and seed phrases block everyday adoption.
- Too complex for legal and ops teams to use daily.
The gap: regulated teams need verifiable trust — without the UX friction.
How Decot closes it
Verify without trusting the vendor
Every key action is recorded in an independent, verifiable audit trail. Any party can check the record without taking Decot’s word — and no admin can quietly rewrite it.
Private by default
Documents are encrypted before they’re stored. We keep no readable copy — only you and the people you authorise can open them.
No wallets, real adoption
Sign in with Google, Microsoft or email. No seed phrases, no extensions — the workflow your legal and ops teams will actually use every day.
Proof, not promises
Don’t take our word for it. Check a real one.
Every contract produces an independent, verifiable audit trail — and the document itself stays encrypted. Here’s a real one: open the public record and check it yourself, without trusting Decot. What’s public is only tamper‑evident proof, never your document.
A real, independently verifiable example. Demo data, identities anonymised.
